HAHA THIS IS HILARIOUS

Sven-Goran Eriksson is on 'Who wants to be a Millionaire' and has reached
the £1 million question.

Chris Tarrant says,

"Right Sven, this is for £1,000,000 , and remember, you still have two
lifelines left, so please take your time.

"Here's your question: What type of animal lives in a Set?

"Is it. a, a badger b, a ferret c, a mole or d, a cuckoo?"

Sven ponders for a while and says, "No, I'm sorry Chris, I'm not too sure.
I'll have to go 50-50."

"Right, Sven, let's take away two wrong answers and see what you're left
with.

'Badger' and 'Cuckoo' are the two remaining answers."

Sven has a long think, then scratches his head and says,

"No, Chris, I'm still not sure, I'm going to have to phone a friend."

So who are you going to call, Sven?" says Chris.

"Hmmm, I think I'll call David Beckham."

So Tarrant phones David Beckham.

"David, this is Chris Tarrant from 'Who wants to be a Millionaire'.

I've got Sven-Goran Eriksson here, and with your help he could win
£1,000,000. The next voice you hear will be Sven's."

"Hello David" says Sven. "It's the boss here. What type of animal lives in a
set? Is it a badger or a cuckoo?"

"It's a badger, boss." says Becks without hesitation.

"You sure, son?" says Sven.

"Definitely, boss. One hundred percent. It's a badger.

Definitely."

"Right, Chris," says Sven, "I'll go with David. The answer's a badger.

"Final answer, Sven?"

"Final answer, Chris."

"That's the correct answer. You've won £1,000,000!"

Cue wild celebrations.

Next morning at training, Sven calls Beckham across.

"Son, that was brilliant last night. I thought I might be taking a gamble
giving you a call, but you played a blinder!

But how the heck did you know that a badger lives in a set?"

"Oh I didn't, boss..." replies Beckham, ..........
















... But everybody knows a cuckoo lives in a clock!"
 
MaidenMadness said:
you're only bitter cause his red shirt had other badge on the chest :P
Click to expand...

I hate him because of what he did to Alf Inge Haaland and we all know he
did it on purpose :|
After he had admitted it he should have been banned form football
completely.

Playing, Coaching, Managing even going to matches :|
 
rockin_plumber said:
I hate him because of what he did to Alf Inge Haaland and we all know he
did it on purpose :|
After he had admitted it he should have been banned form football
completely.

Playing, Coaching, Managing even going to matches :|
Click to expand...
lots of footballers do what keane did. its nothing unusual
roy at least had balls and lacked brains and he admited it.
 
MaidenMadness said:
lots of footballers do what keane did. its nothing unusual
roy at least had balls and lacked brains and he admited it.
Click to expand...

There are the hard-men of football..........
But I prefer to see them hard.......... but fair.
Keane crossed the line and he should have been punished.
That wasnt a tackle that was assault :|
If I went to a football match and kicked an oposition fan like that and was
caught I would be banned from every ground in England for life :|
And that should have been his punishment :|
 
rockin_plumber said:
There are the hard-men of football..........
But I prefer to see them hard.......... but fair.
Keane crossed the line and he should have been punished.
That wasnt a tackle that was assault :|
If I went to a football match and kicked an oposition fan like that and was
caught I would be banned from every ground in England for life :|
And that should have been his punishment :|
Click to expand...
right lets look at it this way
say some xy player makes a hard tackle on opposing player and it turns out unfair. fine by your logic he gets banned from football for life
fine. ok. fair enough
but what if it wasn't his intention to injure a player but it turned out that way?
would the punishment be fair then?
and who's to say if the player had intention to injure opponent or not? only the player knows what his intentions were
do you really want a prospect of people getting banned from football for life cause of unfortunate chain of events?
 
MaidenMadness said:
right lets look at it this way
say some xy player makes a hard tackle on opposing player and it turns out unfair. fine by your logic he gets banned from football for life
fine. ok. fair enough
but what if it wasn't his intention to injure a player but it turned out that way?
would the punishment be fair then?
and who's to say if the player had intention to injure opponent or not? only the player knows what his intentions were
do you really want a prospect of people getting banned from football for life cause of unfortunate chain of events?
Click to expand...

Ok maybe I was being a bit harsh..........
But if they are 100% certain........... EG The xy player admits he did it on
purpose........ or he just keeps stamping on the player after the initial
tackle........
Then banning would be the result :|
 
rockin_plumber said:
See thats criminal.......... LOL LOL LOL LOL

Did he get a three match ban :|
Click to expand...
you can clearly see his eyes are on the ball
he isn't even looking for the player he is focused on the ball all the way
just look at his eyes


but the verdict
GUILTY
had to pay 60 000 euro to that guy

plus a three month ban i think
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top