rockin_plumber said:
I know the facts can become like that sometimes
It's funny how you only copy and paste the 'facts' that suit you though, instead of continuing a bit......
News
Controversy over Hamilton 'block'
Saturday, 20, October, 2007, 23:43
Lewis Hamilton escaped sanction after a controversial end to qualifying when the Ferrari team felt that the McLaren driver had disturbed Kimi Raikkonen’s final Q3 flying lap.
Hamilton emerged from the pits following his last tyre change just as Raikkonen was powering onto the back straight in the midst of his last hot lap.
The McLaren driver looked as if he might impede Raikkonen’s entry to turn four, but saw him in time and stayed on the inside, giving Kimi the racing line into the corner.
The Finn then got a little out of shape in turn four and went on to qualify behind Ferrari team-mate Felipe Massa and Hamilton.
In light of the 10-place grid penalty imposed on Fernando Alonso at Monza last year for impeding Massa – when the Ferrari driver was never closer than 93 metres to the Spaniard’s Renault approaching the Parabolica corner – there seemed every possibility that Hamilton could find himself sweating on a third stewards’ enquiry within a fortnight. :blah: but if you continued you would note.....
Ferrari brought the matter to the attention of race director Charlie Whiting but, on being told that Hamilton had no case to answer, saw no point in lodging a protest.
Hamilton apologised to Raikkonen after the session but insisted he had done his best to stay out of the way.
“I came out and, obviously, you have to keep to the left of the white [blend] line,” he related.
“The team came on the radio and said that I should be coming out pretty close to Kimi.
“The speed I was doing, with the mirrors vibrating, I couldn’t really see if he was there and at the time I first looked he wasn’t.
“I thought I would stay where I was because he might have been there and we might have crashed, so I just stayed on the inside and waited for him to appear.
“He did, and so I had to brake and bale out otherwise I would have impeded him if I had taken the corner.”
Sounds to me like he did nothing wrong.
And while we are cutting and pasting and spinning stories and so forth,
I just read the Official F1 Website's inter view with FIA president Max Mosley. As Ever, the unbiased one :|
Q: Critics argue that the whole affair was a private vendetta between you and Ron Dennis. How is your relationship with him?
MM:
Civilized. We phone once in a while. Personally I have no problems with Ron but otherwise there are differing positions. Just to give an example: Ron would like to finish every race with a one-two victory whereas it is my take that every entrant should have equal opportunities. So those two opinions don’t jar. But what goes for Ron also goes for Jean Todt, Frank Williams or Flavio Briatore.
Q: For Luca di Montezemolo as well?
MM: With di Montezemolo it is different. He is chairman of Fiat and President of Italian business lobby Confindustria.
My relationship with him is very personal.
Q: So you are intellectually, socially and personally closer to him than to Ron Dennis?
MM: That is probably correct as I know Luca longer and therefore better than Ron. Indeed I’ve known Ron since 1970, but I became really acquainted with him at the end of the eighties, whereas I have known Luca very well since the beginning of the seventies.
Q: Is Ferrari more important for Formula One than other teams?
MM:
Yes.
Not that Max Mosley, Head of the FIA, isn't a Ferrari fan or anything. :|