MaidenMadness
Active Member
what i can't understand is why britney and chistina for thois thread. there are so many better looking females out there. elizabeth hurley, catherine zeta jones, angelina jolie.......
MaidenMadness said:what i can't understand is why britney and chistina for thois thread. there are so many better looking females out there. elizabeth hurley, catherine zeta jones, angelina jolie.......
LOL LOL LOLBockaaarck said:Exactly, where's Peggy, from Hi-De-Hi :? she was a beauty
..and will devorce ~tomorrow or something.rockin_plumber said::shock: Britney....................... She got married :shock:
you were right!!!QazKFD said:..and will devorce ~tomorrow or something.
the_nomad said:Angelina Jolie is re-touched everywhere !!!!
She has wrong lips and plastics bosoms !!!!!
Catherine Zeta-Jones is too reserved,
not really expansive (but I like her bosoms - she's very nice in
'INTOLERABLE CRUAUTE' with Georgio CLOONEY')
Elizabeth Hurley is not really my 'cup of tea'
LOL LOL LOL
In your fucking dreams, your WILDEST DREAMS! -Bruce DickinsonTheSeventhOne said:All 3 of those women are fit : :bananabang: :bj: :edtongue:
JoonasGers said:What a thread here...... :shock:
They and the like are all just selling-machines (don't know a better word...) meant for little girls and such, and are so pathetic with their attempts to stay popular that I can't find a way to see them "hot", 'cause all I see is just another pop-idol, worth nothing. Find someone who has something in her head, too... :wink: