Official betting thread: when will IMBB be back online?

Tony The Tiger said:
And down again but I think that may be done on purpose because someone posted child-porn there
No it isn't down... :? I'm there right now...
And it wasn't so under-aged maybe 17-21, but still I don't that kinda shit on page where I want to talk about music...
 
MaidenMadness said:
as i heard girl on the pic had 17

I am a gerbil.

Do you believe me? If you believe everything you read that is on a internet forum, you're pretty clueless.
 
MaidenMadness said:
as i heard girl on the pic had 17

That is what the guy claimed... but there are laws in almost all countries prohibiting pornographic pictures of anyone under 18. Including countries like England where the age of consent is 16. So it is considered child-porn legally. And as such the post should be reported to the police. Also there is the chance that if the picture was of his girlfriend, like he claims, that permission was not given to publish it, which is another crime.
 
wicker nomad said:
Maybe not ...but it was still something I wouldn't want Luke to see

Of course. I'm not defending it. I'm just saying the people shouting "child-porn" and "contact the police" are taking it too far. There are like 6 threads about this on the IM BB. They should just report it to the mods and stop talking about it.
 
Cyrus said:
Of course. I'm not defending it. I'm just saying the people shouting "child-porn" and "contact the police" are taking it too far. There are like 6 threads about this on the IM BB. They should just report it to the mods and stop talking about it.
...but where are the mods... :|
 
Tony The Tiger said:
That is what the guy claimed... but there are laws in almost all countries prohibiting pornographic pictures of anyone under 18. Including countries like England where the age of consent is 16. So it is considered child-porn legally. And as such the post should be reported to the police. Also there is the chance that if the picture was of his girlfriend, like he claims, that permission was not given to publish it, which is another crime.
so what you're telling me that any pic of any girl that is under 18 is child porn? so if i took a pic of my girlfirend's breast while both she and i were 17 i can get sued for child pornoghraphy is that what you'r telling me?
 
MaidenMadness said:
so what you're telling me that any pic of any girl that is under 18 is child porn? so if i took a pic of my girlfirend's breast while both she and i were 17 i can get sued for child pornoghraphy is that what you'r telling me?

Only if it was pornographic (sexually explicit)
 
Back
Top