how can i make summin an avatar or how many pixels is it?

The#2RY

The#2RY

Active Member
could you tell me what pixels it is and what it is in lets say 50x50 unless that is pixels if it is it no work
 
rockin_plumber said:
no 88k

or

88,000 bytes
Click to expand...
wrong
one kilobyte isn't 1000 bytes but 1024 bytes or 2 on tenth level
so 88k is 90112 bytes and not 88000 bytes :P

and don't try to argue with me this is what i learn at collage.....besides the boring stuff
 
MaidenMadness said:
wrong
one kilobyte isn't 1000 bytes but 1024 bytes or 2 on tenth level
so 88k is 90112 bytes and not 88000 bytes :P

and don't try to argue with me this is what i learn at collage.....besides the boring stuff
Click to expand...

Ok I stand corrected :P

I am just a dumb plumber :|

I was close though :cry:
 
wicker nomad said:
I am now totally :?
Click to expand...

Look HERE

Not rocket science :P

But it does say in ur profile...

Somebody who sets the rules about avatars said:
Displays a small graphic image below your details in posts. Only one image can be displayed at a time, its width can be no greater than 100 pixels, the height no greater than 100 pixels, and the file size no more than 88 KB.
Click to expand...
 
MaidenMadness said:
wrong
one kilobyte isn't 1000 bytes but 1024 bytes or 2 on tenth level
so 88k is 90112 bytes and not 88000 bytes :P

and don't try to argue with me this is what i learn at collage.....besides the boring stuff
Click to expand...

Ok, so how would you recommened i supernet my class B subnet to get a cheeky extra 64 network addressed machines ( bearing in mind the 2 addresses you lose because of the "Broadcast" and "Network address" IP's available) without causing myself some real hard work :|
 
rockin_plumber said:
I can't be arsed to make my own I search and steal one :err:


Dont tell anyone
Click to expand...


LOL thats what i would have done until i couldnt stop making smileys and avatars etc a couple of weeks ago but now i lost yhem all when my pc fully reset :cry:
 
The#2RY said:
LOL thats what i would have done until i couldnt stop making smileys and avatars etc a couple of weeks ago but now i lost yhem all when my pc fully reset :cry:
Click to expand...

Dont you hate it when that happens :x

Obviously ur gonna back-up regularly now :?
 
Just for reference, the board's configuration is set to 90,000 bytes and dimensions of 100x100
 
Bockaaarck said:
Ok, so how would you recommened i supernet my class B subnet to get a cheeky extra 64 network addressed machines ( bearing in mind the 2 addresses you lose because of the "Broadcast" and "Network address" IP's available) without causing myself some real hard work :|
Click to expand...
we haven't got to networks yet. we'll get there in abt years. in a mean time we are learing the very basics of computing like programming in c, displaying of variables in memory and stuff like that
 
Bockaaarck said:
Ok, so how would you recommened i supernet my class B subnet to get a cheeky extra 64 network addressed machines ( bearing in mind the 2 addresses you lose because of the "Broadcast" and "Network address" IP's available) without causing myself some real hard work :|
Click to expand...
I'm not sure if this was the kind of thing you're talking about, but I'll attempt an answer to this one. I may be completely off track though..

It depends on what type of IP blocks your using. If you've got DHCP assignment of IP's you should be able to change your subnet to like 255.255.0.0 to gain a whole extra addressable set, but you'd have to modify your gateways to drop packets from the IP's outside of the assigned internal ones.

Since you're looking for 64 extra machines, you might be using a 192.168.x.1-255 style IP range with 255.255.255.0 as the subnet, so the above would work. If you're in the 10.x.x.1-255 space, then you wouldnt even have to make any changes to your gateways, as the entire 10.x.x.x space is designated non-routable. (Although, I think the trick would work on a 192.168.x.x network as well).

If its all internet-routable IP space (unlikely, but who knows) then you're most likely screwed and will need to look at using multiple VLANs on routers to simulate one large network. Although Cisco and the like will probably want quite a bit for such functionality.

Disclaimer: I dont guarantee any of the above, applying the changes to a production network may result in death or personal injury, etc etc LOL
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top